Natalie White wins Survivor: Samoa

You may also like...

4 Responses

  1. Swindel says:

    So, the show gets a B+ because the evil guy didn’t win?

    You can’t be the villain, and win Survivor, after the first season… If there are 2 villains to pick from, they’ll pick the best of two evils… If there are 2 heroes to pick from, they’ll pick the one that screwed them over the least…

    Natalie won, because people liked her, and didn’t like Russell… Seeing Russell almost cry because he didn’t win, made me happy…

    Did you see the way Russell dressed? Like it’s 1936, and he’s a gangster… He didn’t care about anyone but himself, throughout the entire game…

    Russell didn’t win because while he can charm and deceive, he has no real people skills… He didn’t make any real friends on the jury…

    Friends vote for friends, not the guy that deceives, then demands respect… Arrogance will get you no where in any jury… Except perhaps, a jury of assholes…

  2. James says:

    Swindel you sound as bitter as the jury.

    I think the B+ is too high. The point was made that the entire first half of the season was a complete bore.

    The point is that the editing made it all about Russell – they made you hate him then made you root for him. He made the entire show. And then he doesn’t even win. He got the winner’s edit and the winner ending up being the coattail rider – she did more in the game than that, but that’s how she was presented. So yeah, it’s a crappy winner.

    And your logic about who screwed over how the least is as flawed as Mick’s. Natalie’s votes were the same as Russell’s the entire game. She screwed them over just as bad as he did.

    And what does Russell’s choice in clothing have to do with how much he cares about other people?

  3. Batty says:

    No friends on the jury? Is this what has happened to Survivor? Making friends? What would have happened if Brett made it into the final 3 and won in a landslide? That is what the viewers were led to believe right? That the jurors would award Brett the title of sole Survivor. WHY? What did he do besides be nice? And certainly the viewers were left in the dark as to who or what Brett actually did in the game. This was indeed Russell’s season but shame on the producers for not allowing more personalities airtime. And shame on those that think Survivor players that lie are bad human beings.

  4. Bruno says:

    If people were NOT trying to send messages through their clothing, they’d all be wearing gray jumpsuits. Russell is a fun, intelligent, and wiley character, but stop and think for a minute. The guy is sociopathic. He revels in getting over on people, is scornful of others who display compassion or emotion, is emotionally stunted, and I would not be surprised that if you dug around he’d have some sort of minor criminal history. He fancies himself a dangerous, gangsta type personality. yes, the jury was bitter, the man deserved to win based on cunning and skill. But sometimes people think that’s not the way to win, and at some point bad behavior in life has to be held accountable. He would have won had he expressed shame for his actions (fake or real) at the final tribal council. Instead, he couldn’t resist letting them know he’d bested them. And most people on this show are big egos. Never show a big ego how you bested them. Big egos often conceal very insecure people. Russell is a fascinating guy, but if you have ever spent time around a sociopath, you will want to steer clear of them, because eventually it ends badly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>