Sandra Diaz-Twine wins Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains

You may also like...

10 Responses

  1. Yay Sandra! says:

    So glad Sandra won and not Russell or Parvati!

  2. Bob says:

    I hate the school of thought that Russell seems to subscribe to – because she wasn’t controversial or because she was fighting from behind and not dominating in any visible way that Sandra is weak or undeserving.

    Face time doesn’t determine worthiness.

  3. Aqua/Boy says:

    I couldn’t believe Colby started crying! What a baby. But he did a good job at his last tribal at exposing some of the things going on and uncovering some of the strategy being used. Best season yet!

  4. Budwizer says:

    Sandra deserved the win. Russell is a dumbass who thinks he’s smart. Who the hell plays Survivor lying and scheming and ever wins? No one. His style of play is might get you to the final three but you’ll never win after telling that many lies and ****ing that many people over. He didn’t even get one vote from the jury. If he gets to play again, he should wake the **** up and realize that Survivor like in life, it’s beneficial to have some integrity.

    He’s lucky he got the fan fave but then again, dirty schemers make for people we love to hate and that means good TV so that isn’t surprising I guess.

  5. Rupert Sucks says:

    I always like seeing how these dirty, grimy people look on the jury after getting cleaned up. Except Rupert. He looks exactly the same. He’s probably the only player who you can’t tell if he’s playing the game or not by looking at him.

  6. Blah says:

    Russell is a hypocrite. He outplayed, outwitted, and outlasted everyone but he couldn’t play the social game. He has no social game. Ruthlessness is necessary to a degree, but don’t let people know you are enjoying cutting them down as you do it. At least act like it’s hard to backstab them.

    The reason he is a hypocrite is because he fails to grasp this concept but he dismisses Sandra as a player because she didn’t outwit anyone and didn’t “do anything” in the game. So if she is unworthy because she didn’t play a complete game, what does that say about Russell?

  7. Justa Fan says:

    Everyone attacking Russell’s game should start to think about what the show would be without people like him, Boston Rob, Jonny Fairplay and the like.

    And, the same goes for the crybabies on the jury who are from from angels themselves. I would have hoped at least during the all-star type seasons, being that they are all self professed fans of the show that they would give credit where credit is due and keep in mind this is a show that’s popular as much for the people on it then the game itself.

    Fill a season up with Candace’s and watch it be the last. At some point someone a Boston Rob or Russell type has to win or no one will play that game and as fans we’ll be the ones losing out.

  8. Lisa says:

    Who voted for Sandra and who voted for Pavarti? I can’t find that information anywhere!

  9. GB says:

    Parvarti did so much more than Sandra. Hell, she used an immunity idol to SAVE Sandra. She made a smart aliance with Russell, but also used it to her advantage and made her own moves when she needed. Plus she actually WON challenges. She shoulda won!

  10. bear says:

    Remember, Russell had a tremendous advantage, None of his opponents had seen him play. He will never make it to the jury if he is on another all-star show.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>